From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-30231-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18129 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2003 01:56:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18111 invoked by uid 71); 28 Feb 2003 01:56:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 01:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030228015601.18110.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Sandor Kovacs <sandor@ctjapan.com>
Subject: Re: c++/9872: temporary destructor not called?
Reply-To: Sandor Kovacs <sandor@ctjapan.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg01468.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/9872; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Sandor Kovacs <sandor@ctjapan.com>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
 <sakovacs@freemail.hu>,
 <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c++/9872: temporary destructor not called?
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 01:54:43 +0000

 Ok, standalone, no library dependent test code is here: I've basically 
 stripped down the QT QString implementation.
 
 Compile:
 - to eat up memory:
    g++ -c bug.cpp
    g++ bug.o -o bug
 - works properly:
    g++ -fno-elide-constructors -c bug.cpp
    g++ bug.o -o bug
 
 Find .cpp, .ii, .s attached: bug.without-felide.s is the one which eats up 
 memory, the other one bug.with-felide.s is the properly working one.
 
 If this is indeed a bug in gcc then if would explain why I have increasing 
 swap usage after running KDE for weeks, even thoug no app. is running. In 
 such cases I to restart KDE and swap usage disappeares. IF indeed it is a gcc 
 bug and SuSE compiled kde using gcc3.2...
 
 Regards,
 Sandor
 
 > Sandor,
 > I attached your preprocessed source. Thanks for sending them in.
 > However...
 >
 > > If I've missed something or you need further info please let me know;
 >
 > ...yes, we are missing something:
 > >   gcc -L/usr/lib/qt3/lib -lqt-mt bug.o -o bug
 >
 > You are linking with libqt-mt.so. What we need is a _self-contained_
 > testcase, i.e. something that we can test without additional libraries. If
 > we don't have that, it is impossible to find out whether the problem is in
 > the compiler itself, or in the code that is in the library that is being
 > linked in.
 >
 > Please try to pack everything into one file, including the necessary .cpp
 > files from qt, such that it can be compiled without linking together
 > several .o or .so files.
 >
 > Thanks
 >   Wolfgang