public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zandy@cs.wisc.edu
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gquinn@cs.wisc.edu
Subject: c/9890: __builtin_apply generates incorrect reference to arguments
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030228202158.17017.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
>Number: 9890
>Category: c
>Synopsis: __builtin_apply generates incorrect reference to arguments
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Fri Feb 28 20:26:01 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: vic zandy
>Release: gcc 3.2.2
>Organization:
>Environment:
linux 2.4.18 i686
intel pentium 4 2.0GHz
>Description:
_builtin_apply passes incorrect arguments
to the function it calls.
>How-To-Repeat:
gcc -o myfile myfile.c
./myfile
observe that output is NOT "foo(1,2)" as it
should be.
note that the right thing happens if
assert(0) in docall is removed.
i have a more complicated example that
exhibits the misbehavior but does not
contain code after the builtin_return,
available upon request
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
----gnatsweb-attachment----
Content-Type: text/plain; name="myfile.c"
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="myfile.c"
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <dlfcn.h>
int
foo(int x, int y)
{
fprintf(stderr, "foo(%d,%d)\n", x, y);
return 0;
}
int
docall(int x, int y)
{
void *args, *result;
void *f;
f = (void*)foo;
args = __builtin_apply_args();
result = __builtin_apply((void(*)()) f,
args, 6*sizeof(int));
__builtin_return(result);
assert(0);
}
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int rv;
rv = docall(1, 2);
return 0;
}
reply other threads:[~2003-02-28 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030228202158.17017.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
--to=zandy@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gquinn@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).