From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-30321-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9298 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2003 21:06:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9283 invoked by uid 71); 2 Mar 2003 21:06:01 -0000
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 21:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030302210601.9282.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/7189: gcc -O2 -Wall does not print ``control reaches end of non-void function'' warning
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/7189; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/7189: gcc -O2 -Wall does not print ``control reaches end of non-void function'' warning
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 12:55:48 -0800

 On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:55:33PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
 > 	PR optimization/7189
 > 	* toplev.c (rest_of_compilation):  Move
 > 	check_function_return_warnings up to just after
 > 	delete_unreachable_blocks.
 
 Ok.
 
 Don't forget to add your testcase.
 
 
 r~