From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3176 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2003 19:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3162 invoked by uid 71); 3 Mar 2003 19:06:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030303190601.3161.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Steve Letter Subject: Re: c++/9923: Include file behaves differently Reply-To: Steve Letter X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/9923; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Steve Letter To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, sletter@slb.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/9923: Include file behaves differently Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 12:52:17 -0600 Could you please explain why it isn't a bug? It IS breaking a bunch of our code. We have to "wrap" the system header, so we have our own (that includes the "real" header). To help me work around this (not a bug) feature, could you explain (a little ) what happens to cause this (not a bug) behavior? your solution of not doing it isn't practical in this case. Thanks. On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 12:16, nathan@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Synopsis: Include file behaves differently > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: nathan > State-Changed-When: Mon Mar 3 18:16:25 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > not a bug. Like the doctor said - 'don't do that then' > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9923 >