From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16410 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2003 22:38:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16360 invoked by uid 48); 4 Mar 2003 22:38:56 -0000 Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 22:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030304223856.16357.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: Steve_Wadsworth@Portasystems.co.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, Steve_Wadsworth@Portasystems.co.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9942: Function Overload Resolution calls wrong function on variable length parameter lists X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Function Overload Resolution calls wrong function on variable length parameter lists State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 4 22:38:56 2003 State-Changed-Why: This is one of the rare cases where it would be helpful if we would have the original code from which you got the preprocessed one. I gather that it is relatively small, but I can't recreate the va_start calls etc. Could you possibly send them to me? Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9942