From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-30461-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23190 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2003 23:40:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23171 invoked by uid 48); 4 Mar 2003 23:40:43 -0000
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 23:40:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030304234043.23170.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: dwang@3upsystems.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: bangerth@dealii.org
Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, dwang@3upsystems.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/9956: objdump incomplete if gcc has option -ggdb (instead of -g)
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00191.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: objdump incomplete if gcc has option -ggdb (instead of -g)

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar  4 23:40:43 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    We need some more information in order to assess this report.
    In particular, we need which version of gcc you are using,
    and we would need the file for which you have the problem,
    in preprocessed form. Please review 
      http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
    for this.
    
    Also, not that objdump is part of binutils and as such
    not part of gcc. If you think that the bug is in objdump
    rather than gcc, then you might want to file a bug with
    the binutils folks.
    
    Thanks
      Wolfgang

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9956