From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18745 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2003 07:46:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18725 invoked by uid 48); 5 Mar 2003 07:46:16 -0000 Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 07:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030305074616.18724.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, richard@wetafx.co.nz From: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, richard@wetafx.co.nz, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/9736: same fp comparison can lead to different results X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: same fp comparison can lead to different results State-Changed-From-To: feedback->suspended State-Changed-By: ebotcazou State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 5 07:46:15 2003 State-Changed-Why: Weird but nonetheless documented behaviour of GCC on x86. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9736