From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-30481-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22394 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2003 10:36:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22380 invoked by uid 71); 5 Mar 2003 10:36:00 -0000
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 10:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030305103600.22379.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Olivier Hainque <hainque@ACT-Europe.FR>
Subject: Re: ada/9961: [3.4:cygwin] gcc/ada/raise.c:640: warning
Reply-To: Olivier Hainque <hainque@ACT-Europe.FR>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00211.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR ada/9961; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Olivier Hainque <hainque@ACT-Europe.FR>
To: David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, bosch@gnat.com, hainque@ACT-Europe.FR
Subject: Re: ada/9961: [3.4:cygwin] gcc/ada/raise.c:640: warning
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:30:00 +0100

 Olivier Hainque wrote:
 > Weired it did not prevent the bootstrap on hpux yesterday.
 
  Humm. I tested on the 3.3 branch only, which explains.
 
  Same for this one, but I checked that the warning went away.