From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7377 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2003 14:16:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7355 invoked by uid 48); 6 Mar 2003 14:16:37 -0000 Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030306141637.7354.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: azsro001@sneakemail.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, azsro001@sneakemail.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/9975: time defined in :: namespace X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: time defined in :: namespace State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 6 14:16:37 2003 State-Changed-Why: I fail to see the problem. The standard prescribes that the contents of C compatibility headers be available in both the global namespace and in namespace std. Could you explain what you think is wrong with gcc's implementation of this rule? Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9975