From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3854 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2003 08:29:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3647 invoked by uid 71); 7 Mar 2003 08:26:07 -0000 Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 08:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030307082607.3646.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Paul Eggert Subject: Re: bootstrap/8686: [sparc-solaris]3.2.1 multilib bootstrap fails: 32-bit Solaris 9 + Sun patch 112963-01 Reply-To: Paul Eggert X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00342.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/8686; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Paul Eggert To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: bootstrap/8686: [sparc-solaris]3.2.1 multilib bootstrap fails: 32-bit Solaris 9 + Sun patch 112963-01 Date: 07 Mar 2003 00:19:02 -0800 bangerth@dealii.org writes: > Paul, in your report you mention a patchset from Sun that was > not available at the time. Did this situation change in the > meantime? Yes. The current patch revision is 112963-05, dated 2002-12-06 (available from ). If the workaround for Sun bug 4747851 is correct, this should fix the problem. However, I haven't verified this, and also the Sun database still lists the bug as not being fixed. > I may not understand the problem in all details, but it > appears to me that there is little value to have a bug > report about a situation we cannot do anything about. The > only thing I see is that we might want to document the > problem in the target specific installation instructions. Yes, that's what I'd do. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8686