public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: werner@almesberger.net To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: debug/10000: gcc -g generates location expressions which are not valid in prologue Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 14:16:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <200303081413.h28EDnO26554@almesberger.net> (raw) >Number: 10000 >Category: debug >Synopsis: gcc -g generates location expressions which are not valid in prologue >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Sat Mar 08 14:16:01 UTC 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Werner Almesberger >Release: 3.3 20030303 (prerelease) >Organization: >Environment: System: Linux ar 2.4.18 #5 Mon Mar 18 09:25:24 ART 2002 i686 unknown Architecture: i686 host: i686-pc-linux-gnu build: i686-pc-linux-gnu target: i686-pc-linux-gnu configured with: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc20030303/ --enable-languages=c >Description: gcc -g generates location expressions which are not valid in prologue This may actually be more a misfeature of DWARF2 than a gcc bug. Theoretically, DWARF2 would allow us to express exactly what is valid and at which location, even during the prologue, but this seems to be quite cumbersome. >How-To-Repeat: Example (with Red Hat's gcc 3.1 20011127 on ia32): $ cat <<EOF >foo.c int main(int argc) { return 0; } EOF $ gcc -g foo.c $ readelf -w a.out ... DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x3f): main ... DW_AT_low_pc : 0x8048398 134513560 ... DW_AT_frame_base : 1 byte block: 55 (DW_OP_reg5; ) <2><40>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_formal_parameter) DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x3a): argc ... DW_AT_location : 2 byte block: 91 8 (DW_OP_fbreg: 8; ) ... $ objdump -d a.out ... 08048398 <main>: 8048398: 55 push %ebp 8048399: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp 804839b: 83 ec 08 sub $0x8,%esp 804839e: 83 e4 f0 and $0xfffffff0,%esp ... Quite obviously, 8(%ebp) only points to argc when we've reached address 804839b, but the debugging information does not provide any indication more precise than DW_AT_low_pc. >Fix: The work-around gdb uses seems to work reasonably well, but I'm a bit worried about whether unusual linkage styles might throw it off. (After all, this has to work with the Linux kernel.) >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-08 14:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-03-08 14:16 werner [this message] 2003-03-08 18:36 Zack Weinberg
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=200303081413.h28EDnO26554@almesberger.net \ --to=werner@almesberger.net \ --cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).