From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-30717-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8799 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2003 03:16:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8785 invoked by uid 71); 10 Mar 2003 03:16:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030310031601.8784.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
Subject: Re: middle-end/9997: Coelesce stack slots for disjoint scopes.
Reply-To: Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR middle-end/9997; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: middle-end/9997: Coelesce stack slots for disjoint scopes.
Date: 09 Mar 2003 22:12:03 -0500

 On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 15:45, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
 > FAIL: g++.dg/opt/alias2.C execution test
 
 I wasn't able to reproduce this with a quick stage1 build.  This might
 take a little time to track down.  I am leaving on a trip tomorrow, so I
 may not be able to look at this until late next week.
 
 Jim