From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-30752-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6189 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2003 15:46:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6158 invoked by uid 71); 10 Mar 2003 15:46:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030310154601.6157.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Subject: Re: optimization/8178: __builtin_ffs broken
Reply-To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00482.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/8178; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
To: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Cc: hristianbiere@gmx.de,
 gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/8178: __builtin_ffs broken
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:41:50 +0100

 > The problem got apparently fixed on mainline.
 
 Probably by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00300.html
 
 > I'm leaving the PR open, since somebody might want to backport the fix
 > to the 3.3 or 3.2 branch.
 
 I'm still getting an ICE on k6 though: 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg00707.html
 
 -- 
 Eric Botcazou