public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: c++/5390: Libiberty fails to demangle multi-digit template parameters. Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:06:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030310210601.23178.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR c++/5390; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu> To: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/5390: Libiberty fails to demangle multi-digit template parameters. Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:03:05 -0600 (CST) > > - gcc up to 2.95 has never generated the cases that your patch addresses > > It does. That is the whole point: 2.95 generates mangled names that are > not supported, while the mangled names produces by older version ARE > supported. OK, thanks for the clarifications. I wasn't aware of this ABI change back then. > > The question thus is: if people are not overly interested in your patch > > (which is regrettable, but apparently the case), then we can as well close > > the PR. Since if we don't, we'll ask the same question again in a year, > > and then people will care even less about 2.95. > > > > What's your opinion on this? > > The reason I filed the PR was because my library generated a mangled > name that made libiberty core. As a library developer I *have* to > support ALL versions of gcc(/libiberty) and was able to think of > a workaround (somehow make sure that the template parameter constant > where always < 10). It is never urgent for to have something fixed: > I have to work with the current version (2.95.1 and up, all of them) > anyway. I understand these concerns. We build our library by 3 or 4 different compilers and a total of 10 different versions or so :-( > So, as far as I am concerned you can close this PR. Does this still hold given DJ's mail? > (Personally, I'd fix it though if I were you - but I am a perfectionist). I might if I could. I have no knowledge of gcc, libiberty, etc at all. My place is gnats, beyond that I can only try to get patch creators and reviewers into contact -- usually a fruitless endeavor... W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-10 21:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-03-10 21:06 Wolfgang Bangerth [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-03-11 20:06 Wolfgang Bangerth 2003-03-11 20:06 DJ Delorie 2003-03-11 2:26 Carlo Wood 2003-03-07 23:16 Carlo Wood 2003-03-07 17:26 DJ Delorie 2003-03-07 16:06 Wolfgang Bangerth 2003-03-07 12:36 Carlo Wood 2003-03-07 2:26 bangerth
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030310210601.23178.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).