From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29285 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2003 21:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29270 invoked by uid 71); 10 Mar 2003 21:26:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030310212600.29269.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Vladimir Makarov Subject: Re: bootstrap/9560: [3.4] Cygwin bootstrap failure - ICE in insn_default_latency Reply-To: Vladimir Makarov X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00509.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/9560; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vladimir Makarov To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, KelleyCook@comcast.net, vmakarov@redhat.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com Cc: Subject: Re: bootstrap/9560: [3.4] Cygwin bootstrap failure - ICE in insn_default_latency Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 18:44:25 -0500 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9560 This case should be closed. I don't think that the bug has been caused by my patch. Right after my patch merging PCH was been done. Also there were a lot of other patches committed during several days before the bug was been reported. In any case, I've checked bootstrap of gcc as of Feb 4 under cygwin and found that the bug had been gone. Vlad