public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: c++/7086: [3.3/3.4 regression] compile time regression
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 02:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030311023601.15387.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR c++/7086; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, brd@paradise.net.nz
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/7086: [3.3/3.4 regression] compile time regression
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:32:25 -0500

 Just FYI, I tried this with -O2 on:
 
 g++ (GCC) 3.3 20030129 (prerelease)
 
 The -ftime-report output was:
 
 Execution times (seconds)
  garbage collection    :   1.56 ( 2%) usr   0.03 ( 3%) sys   3.00 ( 3%) wall
  cfg construction      :   0.33 ( 0%) usr   0.02 ( 2%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  cfg cleanup           :   1.38 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   1.00 ( 1%) wall
  trivially dead code   :   0.30 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   1.00 ( 1%) wall
  life analysis         :   0.33 ( 0%) usr   0.05 ( 5%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  life info update      :   0.13 ( 0%) usr   0.01 ( 1%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  preprocessing         :   0.13 ( 0%) usr   0.01 ( 1%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  lexical analysis      :   0.10 ( 0%) usr   0.05 ( 5%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  parser                :   0.95 ( 1%) usr   0.07 ( 7%) sys   1.00 ( 1%) wall
  expand                :  85.42 (88%) usr   0.24 (25%) sys  86.00 (88%) wall
  varconst              :   0.02 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  integration           :   0.11 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  jump                  :   0.92 ( 1%) usr   0.10 (10%) sys   1.00 ( 1%) wall
  CSE                   :   0.93 ( 1%) usr   0.01 ( 1%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  global CSE            :   0.73 ( 1%) usr   0.05 ( 5%) sys   1.00 ( 1%) wall
  loop analysis         :   0.86 ( 1%) usr   0.23 (24%) sys   2.00 ( 2%) wall
  CSE 2                 :   0.33 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  branch prediction     :   0.19 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  flow analysis         :   0.06 ( 0%) usr   0.01 ( 1%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  combiner              :   0.13 ( 0%) usr   0.01 ( 1%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  if-conversion         :   0.03 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  regmove               :   0.11 ( 0%) usr   0.01 ( 1%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  mode switching        :   0.04 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  local alloc           :   0.23 ( 0%) usr   0.03 ( 3%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  global alloc          :   0.40 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   1.00 ( 1%) wall
  reload CSE regs       :   0.30 ( 0%) usr   0.01 ( 1%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  flow 2                :   0.07 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  peephole 2            :   0.04 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  rename registers      :   0.10 ( 0%) usr   0.01 ( 1%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  scheduling 2          :   0.19 ( 0%) usr   0.01 ( 1%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  shorten branches      :   0.05 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  final                 :   0.06 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.00 ( 0%) wall
  rest of compilation   :   0.55 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   1.00 ( 1%) wall
  TOTAL                 :  97.10             0.96            98.00
 
 
 I couldn't try the testcase on HEAD because it includes preprocessed output
 from the STL; the new parser rejects lots of it, for already well-discussed
 reasons.
 
 -- 
 Daniel Jacobowitz
 MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


             reply	other threads:[~2003-03-11  2:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-11  2:36 Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-03-12 10:56 Steven Bosscher
2003-03-24  8:32 mmitchel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030311023601.15387.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).