From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-30825-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2022 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2003 13:36:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2008 invoked by uid 71); 11 Mar 2003 13:36:02 -0000
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030311133602.2007.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: c/9928: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration
Reply-To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00555.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/9928; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
	ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr, snyder@fnal.gov
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/9928: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:28:18 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9928
 
 This PR was introduced with Eric's patch that fixed another ICE (for 
 c/7741):
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00641.html
 
 So we've exchanged one ICE for another :-)
 
 Greetz
 Steven