From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32606 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2003 15:05:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32576 invoked by uid 48); 11 Mar 2003 15:05:45 -0000 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 15:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030311150545.32572.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, bkoz@redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, bkoz@redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/9780: issues with time_get, time_put not being tied to correct _punct facet. X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00566.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: issues with time_get, time_put not being tied to correct _punct facet. Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->bkoz Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 11 15:05:45 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Mine. State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bkoz State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 11 15:05:45 2003 State-Changed-Why: No longer super-concerned about this, although it is a bug. It doesn't apply to money or numeric facets, because they have their own *punct facets, and this kind of code would not be attempted (instead, the proper *punct facet would also be used). I consider the lack of timepunct in the standard a bug. However, things should still work, even with the current bogus design of time facets. I'll work on a hack to fix this. -benjamin http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9780