From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-30852-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23326 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2003 16:56:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23308 invoked by uid 71); 11 Mar 2003 16:56:02 -0000
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030311165602.23307.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/10016
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00583.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/10016; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/10016
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 10:54:35 -0600 (CST)

 Unfortunately, the fix was in the big new parser merge, so it's not so 
 simple to backport it to 3.3 or even 3.2.3.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth             email:            bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/