From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6485 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2003 20:11:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6466 invoked by uid 48); 11 Mar 2003 20:11:56 -0000 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 20:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030311201156.6465.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: dan.naumov@ofw.fi, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, dan.naumov@ofw.fi, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10030: gcc 3.2(.1) produces broken code with -O2, but not -O X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00594.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: gcc 3.2(.1) produces broken code with -O2, but not -O State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 11 20:11:56 2003 State-Changed-Why: We need a smaller testcase that a whole package. Can you try to identify which function is being miscompiled? Please understand that we are, in general, not able to debug whole packages to find out what goes wrong. For such cases, we really need the help of those who submit bug reports. Please see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10030