From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9910 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2003 23:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9892 invoked by uid 71); 11 Mar 2003 23:36:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 23:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030311233600.9891.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: hp@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Hans-Peter Nilsson Subject: Re: bootstrap/8122: severe build problems for i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1 Reply-To: Hans-Peter Nilsson X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00641.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/8122; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Hans-Peter Nilsson To: Eric Botcazou Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, , Subject: Re: bootstrap/8122: severe build problems for i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:30:26 -0500 (EST) On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > Perhaps. It won't be fixed in 3.2 series. It will be fixed in > > 3.3. > > The audit trail says that you commited a patch on the 3.2 branch. Isn't it > sufficient? If you look closer, you'll notice that this was just *one* patch; a subset of what went on the trunk. The other patches were considered too invasive. The new maintainer for the 3.2 branch might have a different opinion than the old one. brgds, H-P