From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12323 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2003 12:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12309 invoked by uid 71); 12 Mar 2003 12:26:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030312122600.12308.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Aharon Robbins Subject: Re: c/10025: gcc 3.2.2 recognizes complex functions even without complex.h Reply-To: Aharon Robbins X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00676.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/10025; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Aharon Robbins To: arnold@skeeve.com, bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c/10025: gcc 3.2.2 recognizes complex functions even without complex.h Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:15:41 +0200 Document it and call it a feature, eh? I think it's a bug; GCC shouldn't talk about conflicts with any builtin function if the header file for it hasn't been included. This is pretty sad. Arnold > Date: 11 Mar 2003 15:07:13 -0000 > To: arnold@skeeve.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, > nobody@gcc.gnu.org > From: bangerth@dealii.org > Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, arnold@skeeve.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, > gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: c/10025: gcc 3.2.2 recognizes complex functions even without complex.h > > Synopsis: gcc 3.2.2 recognizes complex functions even without complex.h > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 11 15:07:12 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > This is a gnu extension. The builtin conj function is switched > off if you use -ansi or -std=c89. > > W. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10025