From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15177 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2003 12:36:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15163 invoked by uid 71); 12 Mar 2003 12:36:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030312123600.15162.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Volker Reichelt Subject: Re: optimization/8178: __builtin_ffs broken Reply-To: Volker Reichelt X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00677.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/8178; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Volker Reichelt To: christianbiere@gmx.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, rth@redhat.com, falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de Cc: ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr Subject: Re: optimization/8178: __builtin_ffs broken Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:30:29 +0100 (CET) I can confirm that the problem is still present on k6. According to Phil's tester the problem for the ix86 was fixed between 2003-01-31 and 2003-02-01. Therefore I strongly suspect that the following patch (by Richard Henderson and Falk Hueffner) was responsible for the fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-02/msg00033.html That's why I'm asking you, Richard and Falk, could you please have a look at the patch, whether it really did fix things and if yes, why it doesn't fix the k6-issue and whether the fix can be backported to 3.3 or even 3.2? Thanks, Volker