From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25470 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2003 14:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25456 invoked by uid 71); 12 Mar 2003 14:46:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030312144601.25454.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: optimization/6798: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] very long compile time with large case-statement Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00683.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/6798; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: Volker Reichelt Cc: s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl, , , Subject: Re: optimization/6798: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] very long compile time with large case-statement Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:41:34 -0600 (CST) > > Volker, you said you saw this on Linux? I don't see this bug on > > i586-linux, so I hope you can confirm this so we can close this PR, or > > else we should try to find out if this is a target-specific problem. > > > > Greetz > > Steven > > Sorry, but that was Wolfgang and not me Yes, I could reproduce this with mainline. I just checked again, it's fine now on mainline, but it still takes forever on the 3.3 branch. However, for well known reasons I can't update my 3.3 copy, which is still of 2003-03-05. Likewise, my 3.2 copy (from 2003-01-24). So, it seems as if this is fixed on mainline. I'll change the synopsis accordingly. Can anyone double check with the other two branches and newer versions than mine? Thanks W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/