public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Convey <cjc@cs.brown.edu>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: c++/10048: Compiler doesn't catch failure to return a value - causes crashing code
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030312213600.30463.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR c++/10048; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Christian Convey <cjc@cs.brown.edu>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, cjc@cs.brown.edu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/10048: Compiler doesn't catch failure to return a value -
 causes crashing code
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:30:28 -0500

 My apologies for misunderstanding the language.
 
 Thanks for your help.
 
 - Christian
 
 bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: Compiler doesn't catch failure to return a value - causes crashing code
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 > State-Changed-By: bangerth
 > State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 12 21:28:41 2003
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     So what is the question? You are falling off the edge of
 >     this function without a proper return statement. The standard 
 >     says to this (6.6.3.2):
 >       Flowing  off  the  end  of  a
 >       function  is  equivalent  to  a  return with no value; this results in
 >       undefined behavior in a value-returning function
 >     
 >     Undefined behavior is what you get here (a crash). If
 >     you want the compiler to catch this, turn on warnings
 >     which traps here.
 >     
 >     I think there's not much more gcc can do for you here...
 >     
 >     W.
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10048
 
 -- 
 Christian Convey
 Sr. Software Engineer
 Computer Science Dept.,
 Brown University
 


             reply	other threads:[~2003-03-12 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-12 21:36 Christian Convey [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-12 21:28 bangerth
2003-03-12 20:36 cjc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030312213600.30463.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=cjc@cs.brown.edu \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).