From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31010-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30628 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2003 21:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30498 invoked by uid 71); 12 Mar 2003 21:36:00 -0000
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030312213600.30492.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gdr@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/1773: __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L
Reply-To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00740.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/1773; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
To: bkoz@redhat.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, Jens.Maurer@gmx.net,
   gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@gcc.gnu.org,
   pme@sourceware.cygnus.com, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: libstdc++/1773: __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:32:03 -0500

 This is a very old report.  What's the status now?  It was suspended because 
 the standard conforming value for __cplusplus broke libstdc++-v3 on many 
 platforms.  libstdc++-v3 and the C++ front end have both undergone dramatic 
 changes and improvements.  Can this be fixed now?
 
 --Nathanael