From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12563 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2003 02:36:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12549 invoked by uid 71); 14 Mar 2003 02:36:00 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 02:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030314023600.12548.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Ian Wienand Subject: Re: driver/9653: invalid detection of "cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations" condition Reply-To: Ian Wienand X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00813.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR driver/9653; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ian Wienand To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: driver/9653: invalid detection of "cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations" condition Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 13:27:47 +1100 On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 02:21:56AM -0000, bangerth@dealii.org wrote: > I can't seem to come up with a simple example to reproduce this. > Could you check whether this is still happening with a > more recent snapshot of gcc, and possibly extract a > simple procedure how we can reproduce this? I'm terribly sorry I've been meaning to close this. It was actually that I was using a wrapper script around gcc and used $@ to give gcc it's command line. I didn't realise I actually needed "$@" for it to work. This only shows up in arugments like -MT "a b" or -DVER="VERSION 1.0" because the quotes get all lost. Thanks -i