From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19914 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2003 09:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19867 invoked by uid 71); 14 Mar 2003 09:16:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030314091601.19859.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Olivier Hainque Subject: Re: ada/9953: Unsatisfied symbols: U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind (c Reply-To: Olivier Hainque X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00830.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR ada/9953; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Olivier Hainque To: John David Anglin Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, bosch@gnat.com, hainque@ACT-Europe.FR, charlet@ACT-Europe.FR, comar@ACT-Europe.FR Subject: Re: ada/9953: Unsatisfied symbols: U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind (c Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:11:44 +0100 John David Anglin wrote: > It doesn't fix the problem when starting from gcc-3.2.3. Indeed. The Makefile context has changed since then. The approach may be identical. > We appear to need a similar patch for the 3.2 branch. OK. > I am trying the obvious to rebuild 3.2.3 but note that in the 3.2 branch > 5htraceb.adb is also included in the DCE case. I think you just need to remove the specific line from the DCE section and move the new block until after the DCE one. > I'm also wondering about libcl. Could you please elaborate ? I don't see mention of this in the 3_2-branch version of Makefile.in.