From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31141-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29267 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2003 16:16:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29219 invoked by uid 71); 14 Mar 2003 16:16:00 -0000
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 16:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030314161600.29217.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/9999: gcc 3.2.2 failed in 'make'
Reply-To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00871.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/9999; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
To: "Kristvik, Ivar" <kristvik@nettspes.no>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/9999: gcc 3.2.2 failed in 'make'
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:09:15 -0600

 >I did read the solaris specific instructions, but it was not very
 >specific beyond the note that not all make versions do work. 
 
 Umm. No.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/install/
 http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2*
 
 >I do however see from sunfreeware.com that gnu make, flex bison .... are
 >required. 
 >This is a change since I compiled 3.0 version without 
 
 I'm going to close this report. There are plenty of people who can get
 good builds on solaris. Here are some examples:
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-03/
 
 You'll have to read and follow the directions carefully.
 
 -benjamin