From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31231 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2003 18:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31181 invoked by uid 71); 14 Mar 2003 18:36:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 18:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030314183601.31158.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "John David Anglin" Subject: Re: ada/9953: Unsatisfied symbols: U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind (c Reply-To: "John David Anglin" X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00876.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR ada/9953; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "John David Anglin" To: hainque@ACT-Europe.FR (Olivier Hainque) Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, bosch@gnat.com, hainque@ACT-Europe.FR, charlet@ACT-Europe.FR, comar@ACT-Europe.FR Subject: Re: ada/9953: Unsatisfied symbols: U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind (c Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 13:28:45 -0500 (EST) > > I am trying the obvious to rebuild 3.2.3 but note that in the 3.2 branch > > 5htraceb.adb is also included in the DCE case. > > I think you just need to remove the specific line from the DCE section > and move the new block until after the DCE one. The build was successful and libgnat doesn't contain any references from the unwind library. However, I just deleted the 5htraceb.adb from the DCE section. Is it possible that the new block should follow the DCE block in 3.3 and the trunk? > > I'm also wondering about libcl. > > Could you please elaborate ? No, it isn't necessary. Dave -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)