From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19319 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2003 21:19:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19240 invoked by uid 48); 14 Mar 2003 21:19:18 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030314211918.19230.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: drow@sources.redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, tom.horsley@ccur.com From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, drow@sources.redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, tom.horsley@ccur.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: debug/8095: missing dwarf info for parent class X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00883.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: missing dwarf info for parent class Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->drow Responsible-Changed-By: bangerth Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Mar 14 21:19:17 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Analyzed this PR State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 14 21:19:17 2003 State-Changed-Why: Daniel, what's the state of this? If debug generation is really tied to the definition of the first virtual non- abstract function, then I can't see how this could be wrong: no program can be linked without having such a definition, so at one point or other, a definition has to be given, and then the executable also contains the debug information. Unfortunately, my versions of readelf seems to be too old to verify this myself. W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8095