public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> To: drow@sources.redhat.com Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: debug/8095: missing dwarf info for parent class Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:56:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030314215601.18363.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR debug/8095; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu> Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, tom.horsley@ccur.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: debug/8095: missing dwarf info for parent class Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 16:51:45 -0500 On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 03:48:12PM -0600, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > > > As I mentioned, I'd like more opinions... > > Sorry, I understood this but just wanted to raise the issue again -- > opinions will not come in if the question bitrots in gnats :-) (Which is > not your fault -- you had asked, but received no answers.) > > > what if the class is emitted > > in a shared library not compiled using debug info, etc.? I guess the > > question is: we want to emit debug information for all used types. > > Does inheriting from a type count as using it? If so we should > > probably be emitting debug info for Multiple1 in the example in this > > PR. > > This doesn't strike me as a particularly useful idea, since then you would > have to emit debug info in every compilation unit that includes a certain > header file. This might be a lot of duplication. > > If there are ways to tie debug output to a certain member of a class (just > as we do for vtables), then I would say this is a good idea. If someone > doesn't like this, then compile your library with -g. > > But that's just my opinion. I guess that sounds pretty reasonable to me, too. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-14 21:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-03-14 21:56 Daniel Jacobowitz [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-04-15 15:05 bangerth 2003-04-15 13:36 Daniel Jacobowitz 2003-03-17 14:26 Daniel Jacobowitz 2003-03-17 13:06 Horsley Tom 2003-03-14 22:06 Wolfgang Bangerth 2003-03-14 21:56 Wolfgang Bangerth 2003-03-14 21:36 Daniel Jacobowitz 2003-03-14 21:19 bangerth 2002-10-01 12:16 Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-10-01 5:06 Horsley Tom 2002-09-30 13:46 Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-09-30 5:46 tom.horsley
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030314215601.18363.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=drow@mvista.com \ --cc=drow@sources.redhat.com \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).