From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27442 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2003 04:14:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27418 invoked by uid 48); 15 Mar 2003 04:14:13 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 04:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030315041413.27417.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: feeley@iro.umontreal.ca, lucier@math.purdue.edu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, lucier@math.purdue.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, feeley@iro.umontreal.ca, lucier@math.purdue.edu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, lucier@math.purdue.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/3987: propagate_freq enormous performance hit in 3.1 X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00944.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: propagate_freq enormous performance hit in 3.1 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 15 04:14:13 2003 State-Changed-Why: Brad, is this report still imminent? If so, then it would classify as a regression, and we should mark it as that. Unfortunately, I don't have access to such a machine... W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3987