From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31254-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7012 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2003 16:01:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6978 invoked by uid 48); 15 Mar 2003 16:01:42 -0000
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:01:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030315160142.6976.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jkanze@caicheuvreuse.com,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org
From: paolo@gcc.gnu.org
Reply-To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  jkanze@caicheuvreuse.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/10082: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00984.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n

Responsible-Changed-From-To: paolo->unassigned
Responsible-Changed-By: paolo
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 15 16:01:42 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    I guess I have to resign.
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->feedback
State-Changed-By: paolo
State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 15 16:01:42 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Turns out that the compiler is involved!
    Indeed:
    1- Using the code shown in the standard changes nothing of
    the compilation errors.
    2- Comeau together with libcomo compiles just fine the 
    testcase: libcomo has the _same_ code (SGI/HP) for
    uninitialized_copy_ that current g++ has.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10082