From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9385 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2003 16:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9349 invoked by uid 71); 15 Mar 2003 16:36:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030315163601.9347.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: middle-end/8147: Erroneous Duplicate Symbols in GCJ (fwd) Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00989.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR middle-end/8147; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: middle-end/8147: Erroneous Duplicate Symbols in GCJ (fwd) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 10:31:48 -0600 (CST) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 07:00:36 -0700 From: Jim Redman To: bangerth@dealii.org Subject: Re: middle-end/8147: Erroneous Duplicate Symbols in GCJ Wolfgang, It's a 2.x bug. I haven't seen it in the 3.x series - I think it's safe to close it. Thanks, Jim On 2003.03.14 20:35 bangerth@dealii.org wrote: > Synopsis: Erroneous Duplicate Symbols in GCJ > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 15 03:35:17 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > Too bad nobody has looked at this by now... > > In any case, two questions: > - does this still happen with more recent versions of gcc, > say 3.2.2? > - in order to fix it, we need a complete testcase, i.e. > with all module import statements, etc (or whatever the > correct java-speak for this is :-). Please review > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html > for this. > > Thanks > Wolfgang > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8147 > -- Jim Redman (505) 662 5156 http://www.ergotech.com