From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18303 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2003 18:32:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18270 invoked by uid 48); 15 Mar 2003 18:32:17 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 18:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030315183217.18269.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: web/2493: GNATSweb should discourage huge attachments X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01020.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: GNATSweb should discourage huge attachments State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->suspended State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 15 18:32:17 2003 State-Changed-Why: We should review this after the switch to bugzilla. In general, I think large attachments are better than ones were pieces are missing and we have to ask back to get what we need. W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2493