From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4448 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2003 21:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4427 invoked by uid 71); 15 Mar 2003 21:36:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 21:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030315213601.4426.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Neil Booth Subject: Re: c++/10069: -include switch is improperly handled Reply-To: Neil Booth X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01038.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10069; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Neil Booth To: Sean McNeil Cc: Steven Bosscher , gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/10069: -include switch is improperly handled Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 21:32:08 +0000 Sean McNeil wrote:- > I will back out my fix and see if it is still broken. To summarize, the > following type of command would fail: > > gcc -include hack.h -O2 file.cc > > as it would end up taking hack.h as an input file and precompile it into > hack.hcp or something like that. Further, hack.h wouldn't be included > for use by file.cc > > I will send you a detailed example if it still fails after I back out > the change. I make no claims about PCH if that's what you're using. I have no idea how it works or what it does. Neil.