From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31317-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9231 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2003 07:06:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9195 invoked by uid 71); 16 Mar 2003 07:06:02 -0000
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 07:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030316070602.9175.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Subject: Re: c++/9443: [3.4 regression] ICE when accessing a nonstatic member as A::i
Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01047.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/9443; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<larsbj@gullik.net>
Cc: <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: c++/9443: [3.4 regression] ICE when accessing a nonstatic member as A::i
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 07:57:07 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p
 r=9443
 
 Please, notice this Boost regression test
 http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1047771420/dailylog_linux_gcc33, which
 shows this same ICE happening on 3.3, as of today. I believe it should be
 possible to reproduce the ICE with a GCC 3.3 and Boost RC_1_30, maybe even
 compiling the original snippet code. If so, this should be high-priority 3.3
 regression, IMO.
 Volker, did your illegal code really come from Boost before simplification?
 Does Boost have illegal code like that?
 
 Giovanni Bajo