From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32728 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2003 07:16:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32691 invoked by uid 71); 16 Mar 2003 07:16:00 -0000 Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 07:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030316071600.32685.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij Subject: Re: c++/6440: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] template specializations cause ICE Reply-To: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01048.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/6440; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij To: Gabriel Dos Reis Cc: lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org, Jens.Maurer@gmx.net, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/6440: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] template specializations cause ICE Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 14:14:26 +0700 Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org writes: > >| Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] template specializations cause ICE >| >| State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed >| State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa >| State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 15 10:22:25 2003 >| State-Changed-Why: >| Fixed in 3.3/3.4. > >Is the patch easily backportable to 3.2.x? > Backparting this is straightforward. The parser in 3.2 is pretty much the same as 3.3 I see no problem there. --Kriang