From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31327-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9638 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2003 11:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9581 invoked by uid 71); 16 Mar 2003 11:26:00 -0000
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030316112600.9565.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9tur_Run=F3lfsson?= <peturr02@ru.is>
Subject: RE: libstdc++/10094: Regression: wfilebuf::showmanyc return value too high.
Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9tur_Run=F3lfsson?= <peturr02@ru.is>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01057.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/10094; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9tur_Run=F3lfsson?= <peturr02@ru.is>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9tur_Run=F3lfsson?= <peturr02@ru.is>,
	<paolo@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: RE: libstdc++/10094: Regression: wfilebuf::showmanyc return value too high.
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:17:48 -0000

 > > Synopsis: Regression: wfilebuf::showmanyc return value too high.
 > >=20
 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 > > State-Changed-By: paolo
 > > State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 15 13:32:25 2003
 > > State-Changed-Why:
 > >     Ok, however the (interesting) analysis is science fiction
 > >     ;-) : the new showmanyc it's still in review!!
 >=20
 > Indeed :-) seems there is a bug in the old implementation...
 
 Or rather, there is bug in the testcase. My bad :-(
 
 Sorry about this confusion
 Petur