From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31346-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10138 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2003 18:56:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10105 invoked by uid 71); 16 Mar 2003 18:56:00 -0000
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 18:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030316185600.10088.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Subject: Re: debug/9905: [3.4 regression] Unhandled STMT_EXPR in loc_descriptor_from_tree
Reply-To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01076.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR debug/9905; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: bangerth@dealii.org
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: debug/9905: [3.4 regression] Unhandled STMT_EXPR in loc_descriptor_from_tree
Date: 16 Mar 2003 19:47:53 +0100

 bangerth@dealii.org writes:
 
 >     Ugh, who would write such code???
 
 This can happen easily through macros.
 
 Andreas.