From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31378-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30669 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2003 09:16:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30616 invoked by uid 71); 17 Mar 2003 09:16:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030317091601.30590.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/8300: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] [sparc] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:662
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01108.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/8300; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Robert Schiele <rschiele@uni-mannheim.de>
Cc: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, tneumann@pi3.informatik.uni-mannheim.de,
   gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/8300: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] [sparc] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:662
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:05:55 -0800

 On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 06:08:21AM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote:
 > *(&c + 1) is also well defined.
 
 How's that?
 
 > 1. My rewritten example is legal code with no doubt and produces an
 >    ICE whit optimization.
 
 Nyet.
 
 
 r~