From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7793 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2003 10:51:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7746 invoked by uid 48); 17 Mar 2003 10:51:58 -0000 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030317105158.7740.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/9698: [Sparc] Bad UltraSPARC code for va_list/vsnprintf X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01119.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: [SPARC] Bad UltraSPARC code for va_list/vsnprintf New Synopsis: [Sparc] Bad UltraSPARC code for va_list/vsnprintf State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: ebotcazou State-Changed-When: Mon Mar 17 10:51:57 2003 State-Changed-Why: Very likely a duplicate of PR optimization/8726. Could you check out the current gcc-3_2-branch and see whether the problem is fixed ? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9698