From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16210 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2003 12:04:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16186 invoked by uid 48); 17 Mar 2003 12:04:17 -0000 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 12:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030317120417.16181.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: O.Kullmann@Swansea.ac.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org, O.Kullmann@Swansea.ac.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/10112: static data member is not correctly initialised X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01125.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: static data member is not correctly initialised State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: nathan State-Changed-When: Mon Mar 17 12:04:17 2003 State-Changed-Why: the ordering of these two template instantiations is implementation defined. I think there's an algorithm to get the order right nathan http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10112