From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22761 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2003 01:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22720 invoked by uid 71); 18 Mar 2003 01:46:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 01:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030318014600.22718.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Giovanni Bajo" Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01192.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/10098; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: "Wolfgang Bangerth" Cc: "Daniel Frankowski" , Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 02:40:28 +0100 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wolfgang Bangerth" To: "Giovanni Bajo" Cc: "Daniel Frankowski" ; Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:23 AM Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction Even if it looks very strange to me that unstability of operating system can affect compilation this way, I would tend to close this bug, especially if it works for everything from 3.2 to mainline. But it's your call. Giovanni Bajo