From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29273 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2003 02:26:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29183 invoked by uid 71); 18 Mar 2003 02:26:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 02:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030318022601.29164.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01197.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/10098; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: Giovanni Bajo Cc: Daniel Frankowski , Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:18:11 -0600 (CST) OK, will do. Thanks W. As a sidenote: when you send messages like the one below (and the previous one I got), you make them look as if _I_ have sent them, which is not true. Please change this style of quoting. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wolfgang Bangerth" > To: "Giovanni Bajo" > Cc: "Daniel Frankowski" ; > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:23 AM > Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction > > Even if it looks very strange to me that unstability of operating system can > affect compilation this way, I would tend to close this bug, especially if > it works for everything from 3.2 to mainline. But it's your call. > > Giovanni Bajo > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/