From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6894 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2003 04:37:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6838 invoked by uid 48); 18 Mar 2003 04:37:24 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 04:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030318043724.6836.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jason@gcc.gnu.org, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, tausq@debian.org From: jason@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: jason@gcc.gnu.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jason@gcc.gnu.org, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, tausq@debian.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/10091: [3.3 regression] [parisc] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-lang.c:307 X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01204.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [3.3 regression] [parisc] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-lang.c:307 State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed State-Changed-By: jason State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 18 04:37:24 2003 State-Changed-Why: OK, I was wrong; the backend does track alignment info, the problem was the frontend tacking on a INDIRECT_REF/NOP_EXPR/ADDR_EXPR sequence between the COMPONENT_REFs. Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10091