From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31485-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22402 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2003 14:46:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22333 invoked by uid 71); 18 Mar 2003 14:46:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030318144601.22330.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet@ACT-Europe.FR>
Subject: Re: ada/9953: Unsatisfied symbols: U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind (c
Reply-To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet@ACT-Europe.FR>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01215.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR ada/9953; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet@ACT-Europe.FR>
To: Olivier Hainque <hainque@ACT-Europe.FR>
Cc: Arnaud Charlet <charlet@ACT-Europe.FR>,
	dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, bosch@gnat.com
Subject: Re: ada/9953: Unsatisfied symbols: U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind (c
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 15:39:17 +0100

 >  How does it look to you ?
 
 Agreed. I guess -lpthread was added to make --enable-threads happy.
 
 Arno