From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24662 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2003 12:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24572 invoked by uid 71); 19 Mar 2003 12:26:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030319122601.24571.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Giovanni Bajo" Subject: Re: c++/10146: [3.4 regression] [new parser] template function lookup failure(s) Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01260.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10146; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: , , , , Cc: Subject: Re: c++/10146: [3.4 regression] [new parser] template function lookup failure(s) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:18:09 +0100 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p r=10146 To sum it up: >Foo().template foo(u); // does not work >Foo().template bar(u); // does not work These should compile. >Foo().foo(u); // does work ?? >Foo::foo(u); // does work ?? >Foo().bar(u); // does work ?? Yes, because the template parameter of the template member function is deduced from the call. What's wrong with them? Note: I did not verify since I cannot compile GCC 3.4. Giovanni Bajo