From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31573-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20300 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2003 22:46:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20286 invoked by uid 71); 19 Mar 2003 22:46:00 -0000
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 22:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030319224600.20285.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Peter Thompson <peter.thompson@etnus.com>
Subject: Re: debug/10156: g++ 3.2 fails to emit debug location info for a
 local variable inside a class constructor
Reply-To: Peter Thompson <peter.thompson@etnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01303.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR debug/10156; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Peter Thompson <peter.thompson@etnus.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: debug/10156: g++ 3.2 fails to emit debug location info for a
 local variable inside a class constructor
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:42:46 -0500

 Thanks Daniel,
 
 I looked at 1141, and concur with your analysis, since it agrees with 
 ours ;-)  It was submitted only a week ago, so I'm not too surprised it 
 hasn't been hit yet.
 
 Regards,
 PeterT
 
 
 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
 > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:22:11PM -0000, peter.thompson@etnus.com wrote:
 > 
 >>>Number:         10156
 >>>Category:       debug
 >>>Synopsis:       g++ 3.2 fails to emit debug location info for a local variable inside a class constructor
 >>>Confidential:   no
 >>>Severity:       critical
 >>>Priority:       medium
 >>>Responsible:    unassigned
 >>>State:          open
 >>>Class:          sw-bug
 >>>Submitter-Id:   net
 >>>Arrival-Date:   Wed Mar 19 22:26:00 UTC 2003
 >>>Closed-Date:
 >>>Last-Modified:
 >>>Originator:     Peter Thompson - Etnus
 >>>Release:        gcc version 3.2 20020903 (Red Hat Linux 8.0 3.2-7)
 >>>Organization:
 >>>Environment:
 >>
 >>i686 platform
 >>gcc 3.2 compilers (also tried 3.2.1, and 3.2.2 versions with same results)
 >>
 >>>Description:
 >>
 >>We ran into this problem with our debugger, TotalView, but were able to replicate the problem, with a little bit of effort, with gdb.
 > 
 > 
 > Just FYI, the same problem was reported as a GDB bug c++/1141; I
 > forwarded it to gcc-bugs and got no response, and haven't had time to
 > look at it myself.  There's a smaller testcase there.
 >